AutoPIPE Ideas Portal

Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.

  2. COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.

When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

    Showing 187 of 187

    Add ASCE-7-22

    For wind loading ASCE-7-22 needs to be added in selection list. This is the latest standard and client design basis is demanding to use latest standard.
    Guest about 2 months ago in Analysis 0 Planned

    User Having to Re-import .CMB File After Saving .APC File

    When saving APC files, the code/non-code combinations get reset to default by AutoPIPE. User has to go though an extra step of re-importing the relevant .CMB file after saving the APC file. If there is a way to have AutoPIPE maintain the already s...
    Fouad Tabbaq 12 months ago in Reporting 1 Will not implement

    Get rid of annoying windows beep sound

    This is a really annoying sound. The UI shall provide a feature to disable the annoying beep sound. The attached wiki link proposes to disable Windows Sounds, but this disables all other Windows Sounds that serve a purpose outside of Autopipe. A s...
    Sujaan Ahamed Fareed over 3 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Future consideration

    Request for API Support to Capture Model Snapshots in AutoPIPE

    Can AutoPIPE provide a programmatic interface (via Python, VBA, or any other API) to automatically capture graphical snapshots or view-specific images from the model environment? This would greatly enhance reporting and documentation workflows, es...
    Saladi Venkata Srirama Chandra Murthy 6 months ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Reviewed

    Piping comparison feature

    When systems are revised it would be useful if a user could import new files from designers and see them directly on top of existing systems. This would allow a user to be able to visually see and measure changes. Updated files can be imported but...
    Guest 7 months ago in Modelling 1 Needs review

    Separate the Support Forces Global Direction column by x, y, and z

    About the support forces of the Excel Report of the report manager The Global_Direction outputs the same column, but users need to separate them by X, Y, Z. Please develop the AutoPIPE to separate the column by x, y, and z?
    Yasushi Nagao 3 months ago in Reporting 1 Future consideration

    Correct scale of supports located on valve actuator

    AutoPIPE deals with a valve actuator as a rigid beam. The default size for the rigid beam is set as a 10x10 W shape, and any support connected to the actuator is scaled according to that number (see attached image) Request actuator and any support...
    Mike Dattilio 5 months ago in Modelling 1 Planned

    Add manufacturer library for SIF's to populate to meet B31.J as per B31.3 2020

    Add manufacturer library to select for SIF's to populate to meet B31.J as per B31.3 2020
    Guest over 2 years ago in Analysis 0 Needs review

    Flexible Joint Step Function Stiffness

    Looking for an update to flex coupling input box to better model flexible coupling behavior. Flexible joint additional inputs (see attached) 1) Max angle of deflection for flex joint 2) Two stiffness inputs for bending stiffness. Stiffness changes...
    Guest almost 3 years ago in Modelling 0 Future consideration

    Add the capability to analyse multiple piping codes in a single model

    Whilst using AutoPIPE Nuclear to assess pipework to ASME III, the models included different regions of pipework that were required to be assessed to ASME III Class 1 and Class 2 respectively. As it is not possible to assess to two different piping...
    Guest over 1 year ago in Analysis 4 Future consideration