Skip to Main Content
AutoPIPE Ideas Portal

Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.

  2. COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.

When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.

ADD A NEW IDEA

FILTER BY CATEGORY

All ideas

Showing 33 of 33

Support Detail Fig # and Allowable Support Load Ratings

Ensuring support info (gaps, friction, stiffness) is correct and reviewing support results are some of the more time consuming tasks. It would be very handy to be able to set up a library of support detail figure numbers with allowable load ratings.
Sean Pellerin 6 days ago in Reporting 0

Reference Loads - Results Database

Currently, AutoPIPE does not have the option to export reference loads to a .mdb file. I want to be able to easily compare the Reference Loads to their allowable. This is most handy when you have radial nozzles. Please include the allowable loads ...
Sean Pellerin 6 days ago in Reporting 0

Add feature to easily check displacements at either end of an expansion joint or flexible connection for comparison with manufacturers allowables

No description provided
Guest about 1 month ago in Analysis 0

Why there is no option what components to show after clicking the show component dialog box

Hello,When you work with a model that consiously you hide different kind of components in it, and then you want to show only one kind of hidden components for example the guide supports, it turns out that such a function does not exist in Autopipe...
Wojciech Augustyn 2 months ago in Modeling 0

Modeling soils in AutoPIPE should be simplified

In my opinion modeling of soils in AutoPIPE takes to much time and could/should be simplified. For selected part of the model, including simultanously vertical, horizontal or inclined segments, there are four geometrical methods to define a terrai...
Guest 3 months ago in Modeling 1

Option to un-check B31J

There should be option to un-check B31J even if we use Ed.2020. This will help during anlaysis which comprises of both ASME Sec-1 & B31.1 pipes. Hence there should be an option to uncheck if not required. By default it should be “ticked” but i...
Guest 4 months ago in Analysis 0

Bolt Pre Tension

Possibility to declare bolt pre tension (eg, 40% or 50% of bolt SMYS) has to be provided in the Flange check.
Guest 4 months ago in Analysis 0

Group Segments

Add the ability to group a selection of segments to be easily selected
Guest 5 months ago in UI 0

Allow gap supports with response spectra analysis

Response spectrum analysis is a static equivalent linear analysis to a dynamic earthquake event. AutoPIPE allows the use of V-Stops with gaps for static analysis. The condition of the gap closure and subsequent support loading is determined by eva...
Guest 6 months ago in Analysis 0

Allow stresses from soils to be combined with other pipe stress loads in user defined combinations

Currently ring bending stresses in pipes from soil loads cannot be exported within a separate user-defined load combination (like gravity / thermal / poisson loads etc.) but has to be exported as part of a very specific pre-determined code combina...
Guest 6 months ago in Analysis 0