Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.
You have 3 options for providing feedback:
VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.
COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.
ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.
When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.
AutoPIPE can model a Victaulic fitting using a number of approach mentioned here . However this is a very difficult and demanding process. Not to mention, that in some case there are converging issues related to multiple Flexible joints on connect...
5 months ago
Display response spectrum acceleration results using the 'interactive' results viewer (showing deformed model and acceleration values)
The AutoPIPE 'interactive" menu has a way to display displacement results and filter results. Presently, the acceleration results in a response spectrum analysis are only viewable from the text result files or excel reports.
Having a GUI accelera...
Support Results grids local direction should be user friendly and consistent
Open the results grids, select the support tab, and locate the columns for LocalDir1 - Gap3. Quick what does this refer to: pipe local axis, support local axis? Is this direction consistent across all of the support types (see attached image of Su...
7 months ago
Why there is no option what components to show after clicking the show component dialog box
Hello,When you work with a model that consiously you hide different kind of components in it, and then you want to show only one kind of hidden components for example the guide supports, it turns out that such a function does not exist in Autopipe...
There should be option to un-check B31J even if we use Ed.2020. This will help during anlaysis which comprises of both ASME Sec-1 & B31.1 pipes. Hence there should be an option to uncheck if not required. By default it should be “ticked” but i...
Allow stresses from soils to be combined with other pipe stress loads in user defined combinations
Currently ring bending stresses in pipes from soil loads cannot be exported within a separate user-defined load combination (like gravity / thermal / poisson loads etc.) but has to be exported as part of a very specific pre-determined code combina...