AutoPIPE Ideas Portal

Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.

  2. COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.

When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Showing 109 of 109

Reference Loads - Results Database

Currently, AutoPIPE does not have the option to export reference loads to a .mdb file. I want to be able to easily compare the Reference Loads to their allowable. This is most handy when you have radial nozzles. Please include the allowable loads ...
Sean Pellerin over 1 year ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 1 Future consideration

Why there is no option what components to show after clicking the show component dialog box

Hello,When you work with a model that consiously you hide different kind of components in it, and then you want to show only one kind of hidden components for example the guide supports, it turns out that such a function does not exist in Autopipe...
Wojciech Augustyn almost 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 1 Will not implement

Modeling soils in AutoPIPE should be simplified

In my opinion modeling of soils in AutoPIPE takes to much time and could/should be simplified. For selected part of the model, including simultanously vertical, horizontal or inclined segments, there are four geometrical methods to define a terrai...
Guest almost 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 2 Future consideration

Option to un-check B31J

There should be option to un-check B31J even if we use Ed.2020. This will help during anlaysis which comprises of both ASME Sec-1 & B31.1 pipes. Hence there should be an option to uncheck if not required. By default it should be “ticked” but i...
Guest almost 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 1 Will not implement

Bolt Pre Tension

Possibility to declare bolt pre tension (eg, 40% or 50% of bolt SMYS) has to be provided in the Flange check.
Guest almost 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Needs review

Group Segments

Add the ability to group a selection of segments to be easily selected
Guest almost 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Future consideration

Allow gap supports with response spectra analysis

Response spectrum analysis is a static equivalent linear analysis to a dynamic earthquake event. AutoPIPE allows the use of V-Stops with gaps for static analysis. The condition of the gap closure and subsequent support loading is determined by eva...
Guest about 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Future consideration

Allow stresses from soils to be combined with other pipe stress loads in user defined combinations

Currently ring bending stresses in pipes from soil loads cannot be exported within a separate user-defined load combination (like gravity / thermal / poisson loads etc.) but has to be exported as part of a very specific pre-determined code combina...
Guest about 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Needs review

StressISO Title Block Automatic Fill

Add the ability to populate the title block information: dates, line number, etc.
Michael Olive about 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Needs review

100-40-40 spatial combination option

In Response Spectra Analysis, the spatial combination is always SRSS. The NRG 1.92 rev. 2 accepts as an alternative the use of the 100-40-40 method, as proposed by Newmark, to spatially combine the components. An option to select between SRSS or 1...
Edgar Flores over 2 years ago in AutoPIPE Pipe Stress 0 Future consideration