Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.
You have 3 options for providing feedback:
VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.
COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.
ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.
When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.
Thanks Jeff for posting this. In the past we have resisted doing this as it is the job of the design applications and not the stress applications. Also we use Pipe ID for defining a lot of parameters and often we can have hundreds of Pipe IDs, particularly if importing geometry from CAD, that are very similar with minor differences. These would all report hundred of run lengths. This is normally dealt with in the design apps using specs, we do not have this control. We can look at pushing this information, but the clean up would have to be at the User's end. Alternatively we can report based on OD and thickness and/or material and group this way.