AutoPIPE Ideas Portal

Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.

  2. COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.

When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Needs review
Categories UI
Created by Guest
Created on Sep 16, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Import multiple load cases from pcf files

We are trying to reduce the steps required to edit piping in initial design. We have multiple transients that all have to be accounted for. In order to hold a consistent model, we are trying to make any and all changes in SolidWorks and import into Autopipe. This has become challenging while evaluating 6 known thermal cases that all affect the piping in odd ways.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Sep 17, 2024

    Phil,

    I think we can make this function as a workaround. My hope was to be able to claim a number of attributes (say 11-20) or other metadata sets (say Case#Temp, etc) to have additional cases for only T/P, even if we didn't get the full 6 cases. If this isn't possible, we can work through populating into an additional text doc. The concern from my side is we are trying to limit the number of places changes must be tracked. This would give us another program/file that must be updated after a change in the model.

    Travis

  • Admin
    Phil Senior
    Reply
    |     Sep 17, 2024

    Thanks for the Idea Travis. I spoke with the support team about this and viewed your data. We can map one pair of P/T information if it exists in the first 10 Component Attributes, but not any more. Creating another level of mapping to separate different load cases would require some work. Since then amount of attributes used varies from one user to the next, would some way to select an attribute and pick the mapping be a solution. We would still have to be able to manage the additional level required to accommodate multiple load cases.

    For PXF import we support an additional text file called LINELIST.TXT this is used to bring in various P/T information and assign them to line numbers within the model. Would this be a solution for you if we can support this in PCF?