AutoPIPE Ideas Portal

Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.

  2. COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.

When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Needs review
Categories Analysis
Created by Guest
Created on Jul 29, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Total Computing Power

I noticed that Autopipe uses a limited amount of computer power. In a time-history analysis with a modal frequency of 400hz on a relatively small model it took about 30min using only 6 to 9% of the computer's processing power. An improvement in processing power so that Autopipe uses the resources available on the computer would be very welcome.

  • Guest
    Reply
    |     Jul 30, 2024

    it's a water hammer analysis. Typical frequencies range from 150 - 400Hz. In this particular analysis, I was able to use 280Hz and below that, the program displays a danger message.

    Captura de tela...
    Captura de tela 2024-07-30 133050.jpg
    Open full size
    Captura de tela 2024-07-30 133050.jpg
    1 reply
  • Admin
    Phil Senior
    Reply
    |     Jul 30, 2024

    We are looking at utilising more cores for doing static analysis, report writing and post processing, however this would not increase the speed in this modal analysis. Since we currently can only use one core, percentage processing power indicated could represent that single core on your machine. It is unclear how we can improve the speed of the modal solution, and 30mins in extreme. So I suspect this is related to the flexibility of your model and the fact you are searching for modes up to 400Hz which is high. Is there a reason to go to such high frequencies?