AutoPIPE Ideas Portal

Welcome to the AutoPIPE Ideas Portal. We value your feedback, and our team regularly reviews your ideas and considers them for future improvements to our products and services.

You have 3 options for providing feedback:

  1. VOTE for an existing idea. The popularity of an idea helps us understand its importance to the community.

  2. COMMENT on an existing idea. We want to hear your unique point of view.

  3. ADD a new idea. You can always submit a new idea if no existing one describes your suggestion.

When you add, vote or comment on an idea you will also be subscribed to that idea and receive status updates. Please note we may merge or rename ideas for better clarity for the community. Thank you for your support and feedback.

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Future consideration
Categories AutoPIPE Pipe Stress
Created by Guest
Created on Mar 26, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Extract system Response Spectra at decoupled connection points

The capability of producing FRS at some points is sometimes needed to analyze small bore branches. Generally, the small bore branches could be decoupled from the headers for seismic analysis, but these lines shall be evaluated separately using the header FRS at the connection points. Piping stress analysis software such as PIPESTRESS (PepS) can create such FRS at branch connections. So, I was wondering if AutoPIPE can do the same.

  • Admin
    Phil Senior
    Reply
    |     Apr 2, 2024

    Hello Voria - What is the specific use case here? I can appreciate that there would be some advantages to considering the large bore first, but since the small bore will influence the branch connections wouldn't it just be simpler and quicker to combine both together to give a true representation of the piping system. Features like this probably are left over from the days when we didn't have the computer memory or power to analyse both together, but now we do not have any such restrictions.

    2 replies